A friend who loves swimming once said that sometimes she wondered whether she was a fish dreaming of being a girl or a girl dreaming of being a fish. With that, the seeming dilemma hidden within that ancient question came into to my thought. I remembered several quotes from well known thinkers and some casually shared views. Several of them are shared below.
“He's dreaming now," said Tweedledee:
"and what do you think he's
dreaming about?"
Alice
said "Nobody can guess that."
"Why, about YOU!" Tweedledee exclaimed, clapping his hands triumphantly.
"Why, about YOU!" Tweedledee exclaimed, clapping his hands triumphantly.
"And if he left off dreaming about you, where do
you suppose you'd be?"
"Where
I am now, of course," said Alice.
"Not
you!" Tweedledee retorted contemptuously.
"You'd be
nowhere. Why, you're only a sort of thing in his dream!"
~Lewis
Carroll, Through
the Looking-Glass
– in
this exchange, Carroll approaches the relationship of Mind to its
ideas.
.
Once
upon a time, I, Chuang Chou, dreamt I was a butterfly, fluttering
hither and thither, to all intents and purposes a butterfly. I was
conscious only of my happiness as a butterfly, unaware that I was
Chou. Soon I awaked, and there I was, veritably myself again. Now I
do not know whether I was then a man dreaming I was a butterfly, or
whether I am now a butterfly, dreaming I am a man. Between a man and
a butterfly there is necessarily a distinction. The transition is
called the transformation of material things.
~Zhuangzi
-
is partially quoted by Hesse in Siddhartha. Interestingly,
absorption is denied while material change or transition is
recognized. The door appears open to this principle: Divine
Science, rising above physical theories, excludes matter, and
being resolves things into thoughts, and replaces the objects
of material sense with spiritual ideas.1
.
Enlightenment
shows no difference between the man and the butterfly. ~Non
~a
belief that in an enlightened state, man is unlimited by ignorance,
without desire and suffering and finds unity - without distinction of
form or nature. In Christian Science, we understand that man is
an individualized expression of his Creator, Spirit. We find that
experiencing harmony of ideas does not mean loss of identity. This
scientific sense of being, forsaking matter for Spirit, by no means
suggests man's absorption into Deity and the loss of his identity.2
.
Pinch
your self in both states, the state in which you experiences pain is
the real one. ~Non
-
this suggestion indicates a belief that a corporeal sense
of physical pain proves the real.
It ascribes intelligence to matter, the ability to recognize Truth.
This belief contradicts both the infinite goodness of God and the
scientific statement of being that
begins: There
is no life, truth, intelligence, nor substance in matter.3
.
[Man] is
the compound idea of God ...the generic term for all that reflects
God's image and likeness [and] ...possesses
no life, intelligence, nor creative power of his own, but reflects
spiritually all that belongs to his Maker.4
-
Mind and its idea, man, includes, by reflection, all that the Father
knows. What Mind knows is all that is knowable. Thus, man cannot know
anything but what Omniscient Mind thinks. Men may seem to accept
material suggestions that they can originate personal, independent
thoughts. However this is not possible because one God governs all
and is not subject to men's beliefs.
My
friend, you are God's image and likeness. Therefore, you include the
Fish-Mermaid-Dolphin-Butterfly ideas but are not absorbed by them.
You are free to claim their unique qualities. They are all yours to
express and enjoy.
So, swim,
walk, dance, running, fly, move and live freely and with delight!
'-'
__________
1, 2, 3, 4 citations
from Science
and Health with Key to the Scriptures by Mary
Baker Eddy
.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment